ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

We extend our sincere appreciation to all those who contributed to the successful implementation and evaluation of the Hot Meals Project in Gaza. Special thanks go to LIFE for their generous donation, the field staff, shelter coordinators, beneficiaries, and community leaders whose support made this operation possible under extremely challenging circumstances. We also acknowledge the tireless efforts of our Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) team, whose dedication ensured accurate data collection and analysis. Lastly, we are grateful for the generous support of our donors and partners who made this emergency response feasible.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the final evaluation of the Hot Meals Project conducted in Gaza in June 2025. The project aimed to provide immediate food relief to populations affected by extreme food insecurity due to ongoing conflict and resource shortages. Over a 30-day period, 500 hot meals were distributed daily to 500 families (approximately 3,500 individuals), with a special focus on children, the elderly, and displaced persons.

Evaluation findings demonstrate that the project successfully met its objectives, with 100% of surveyed beneficiaries confirming that the hot meals were their main source of nutrition and helped prevent starvation. Quantitative data show a significant reduction in acute food insecurity, while qualitative data highlight improved nutritional well-being, particularly among children and elderly beneficiaries. Operational challenges were managed effectively despite the volatile security environment.

The Post-Distribution Monitoring (PDM) survey conducted at the end of the project further validated these results. 90% of respondents rated the quality of meals as very good, and 100% confirmed daily delivery without interruption. The meals were widely viewed as nutritious, hot, and culturally appropriate, contributing to high levels of satisfaction. Beneficiaries also reported visible improvements in children’s energy and mood (83%) and reduced fatigue among elderly family members (76%). Additionally, 100% of respondents expressed trust in the distribution team, citing respectful treatment and fair delivery practices.

Key lessons learned emphasize the importance of early procurement, strong local partnerships, and adaptable implementation strategies in volatile contexts. The success of this intervention underscores the critical role of hot meal distributions in addressing acute food insecurity while preserving dignity among affected populations.

1.INTRODUCTION

1.1  Hot Meals Project in Gaza

 

In response to the acute humanitarian crisis in Gaza, exacerbated by ongoing conflict and a stringent blockade, the project aims to deliver immediate relief and establish sustainable infrastructure. The initiative encompasses the daily distribution of 500 meals over 30 days period during June project.

As of May 19, 2025, the food situation in Gaza has reached a critical state, with the entire population facing acute food insecurity and a significant portion experiencing catastrophic hunger.

Humanitarian Crisis Overview

Blockade and Aid Restrictions: Since March 2, 2025, Israel imposed a total blockade on Gaza, halting all humanitarian aid and commercial supplies. This has led to severe shortages of essential items, including food, fuel, and medical supplies.

 

Acute Food Insecurity: According to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), the entire population of Gaza is experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity. Approximately 470,000 people (22% of the population) are facing catastrophic conditions (IPC Phase 5), with the rest in emergency or crisis levels .

Child Malnutrition: The blockade has severely impacted children, with reports indicating that 66,000 children are suffering from severe malnutrition.

 Recent Developments

Limited Aid Resumption: Under international pressure, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the resumption of minimal humanitarian aid, including baby food, flour, and medical supplies. However, as of today, no aid has entered Gaza, and aid organizations have criticized the proposed distribution system as inadequate .

Infrastructure Destruction: The ongoing conflict has destroyed significant portions of Gaza’s agricultural infrastructure, including greenhouses and tree crops, further exacerbating food shortages.

The Hot Meals Project was launched in response to the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where prolonged conflict has devastated infrastructure and access to basic necessities. With extreme food insecurity reaching critical levels, this emergency project provided hot, nutritious meals to families lacking access to food or cooking facilities.

 

This project supports to provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza, who are facing extreme conditions due to ongoing conflict and severe resource shortages. The operation focuses on food as a critical need.

The primary activity of the operation includes:

• Meal Distribution: The distribution of 500 meals daily to those in urgent need for 30 days.

Link to the 17 SDGs:

SDG 1: No Poverty: Alleviating the economic burden on struggling families. SDG 2: Zero Hunger: The Projects achieve food security, improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture and ensure access to safe, nutritious food; end malnutrition; increase agricultural productivity; promote sustainable food systems.

SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being: By Providing balanced meals to improve health conditions.

The project aligns with key national, regional, and local sectorial policies, ensuring its relevance and contribution to broader development goals. At the national level, the project supports Gaza’s National Food Security Strategies aimed at addressing hunger and improving food distribution systems across Gaza. On a regional scale, the project contributes to the Arab Strategy for Sustainable Development by enhancing food security in the Middle East. At the local level. The project’s objectives complement these existing policies and contribute to achieving both short-term relief and long- term sustainability

1.1.1  Project Goal:

 

Reduction in acute food insecurity among targeted population

1.1.2  Project Objectives:

Provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza, who are facing extreme conditions due to ongoing conflict and severe resource shortages.

The objective was planned to be achieved by:

1.      500 families receive daily hot meals for 30 days

2. Improved nutritional status of children and elderly

The project was implemented in North Gaza shelters were families from Jabalia, Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahia are displaced

1.2  Purpose and Objectives of Final Evaluation

 

The purpose of this final evaluation is to assess the project’s relevance, effectiveness,

and impact in reducing acute food insecurity. It aims to:

• Verify achievement of log frame outputs and
• Analyze beneficiary
• Identify operational strengths and
• Provide lessons learned and recommendations for future

 

2.  METHODOLOGY

2.1   Preparation

 

Evaluation tools, including questionnaires and interview guides, were developed based on the project’s logframe and M&E plan. Staff training was conducted to ensure consistency in data collection.

2.2  Population of Study

 

The study population included all 500 beneficiary families receiving daily hot meals, with special focus groups held with children, elderly individuals, and caregivers.

2.3  Sample Selection

 

A stratified random sampling approach was used. 20% of the beneficiary households (100 families) were selected for surveys, and key informant interviews were conducted with 5 shelter administrators and 5 field workers.

2.4  Data Collection

 

Data was collected through:

• Structured interviews with
• Post-distribution monitoring (PDM)
• Field
• Daily distribution
• Reports from shelter

 

2.5  Data Editing and Analysis

Quantitative data were processed using statistical software (Excel). Qualitative responses were thematically coded and analyzed manually for patterns related to food security and project impact.

2.6  Participants in the Participants in the Final Evaluation

 

• Project M&E staff
• Field coordinators and distribution teams
• Shelter administrators
• Beneficiary households

3.  FINDINGS

3.1  Preliminary Results:

 

The preliminary results of the final evaluation indicate that the Hot Meals Project in Gaza successfully achieved its core objectives of alleviating acute food insecurity among displaced families during June 2025.

The Post-Distribution Monitoring (PDM) survey was conducted with 100 households across displacement shelters in Beit Lahia, Jabalia, and Beit Hanoun during the final days of the Hot Meals Project in June 2025. The survey aimed to assess the relevance, quality, and impact of the meal distributions on beneficiary households, particularly those living in extreme humanitarian conditions. Key findings include:

 

 

1-      Household Profile

 

• Average household size: 6–7 members
• 91% of households included children under 12
• 64% had at least one elderly member
• 38% were female-headed households

2-      Meal Access and Dependency

 

• 100% relied on the hot meals as their only regular food source
• 89% had no access to kitchens, gas, or raw food
• One meal per person per day was the norm

 

3-      Meal Quality and Cultural Relevance

 

• 90% rated meal quality as very good, 10% as good
• 100% confirmed the meals were hot at delivery
• 94% said the meals were culturally appropriate
• 88% of children and 82% of elderly participants liked and accepted the meals

4-      Timeliness and Distribution Experience

 

• 100% confirmed daily delivery without interruption
• 97% said meals arrived on time
• 100% felt respected by staff and experienced no discrimination
• 100% trusted the distribution team and felt the process was fair

5-      Food Security and Well-being

 

• 94% reported a visible reduction in hunger
• 83% observed improved mood and energy in children
• 76% of elderly respondents reported reduced fatigue and improved health
• 62% of elderly said they could take their medication more regularly

These results strongly suggest that the intervention was not only timely and relevant but also delivered measurable improvements in food access and nutritional well- being among the most affected populations in northern Gaza.

3.2  Quantitative Findings

 

• Key Findings Against Key M&E Indicators

 

Indicator	Target	Achieved	Source
Beneficiaries reporting reduced food insecurity	≥ 90%	94%	Interviews
Beneficiaries living in extreme conditions	1	100%	PDM Surveys
Meals delivered daily	500	50000%	Distribution Logs

 

Meals delivered over 30 days	15000	%	Field Reports
Meals provided to children/elderly	≥ 60% of total	67%	Monitoring Reports

 

 

 

3.3  Qualitative Findings

 

 

The qualitative data collected through interviews, PDM, and field reports reveal the human impact and broader context of the intervention. The voices of beneficiaries and field staff highlight the emotional, psychological, and nutritional significance of the Hot Meals Project.

3.3.1    Dependence on the Project for Survival

 

Nearly all interviewed families reported that the hot meals were their only consistent source of food during the 30-day period. Many families had no access to cooking facilities or raw food due to displacement and destruction of homes.

“We have no kitchen, no gas, and no money. These meals were not just food—they were survival for my children.” .Mother, Shelter in Beit Hanoun

3.3.2. Positive Effects on Children’s Well-being

 

Caregivers observed noticeable changes in children’s behavior and health during the meal distribution period. Many reported improved energy, reduced signs of distress, and more active participation in daily activities.

“Before the meals started, my children were weak and crying all the time from hunger.

After a few days, they were laughing, playing again.” Father of five, Jabalia Shelter.

 

“My son was getting sick from eating leftovers or nothing at all. The meals brought back his strength.” .Female caregiver, Beit Lahia

3.3.3 Improved Health and Mood Among the Elderly

 

Elderly beneficiaries, often among the most nutritionally vulnerable, reported feeling stronger, more alert, and less fatigued during the project.

 

“The food helped me take my medicine properly. Without meals, I felt dizzy all the

time.”. Elderly man, age 72

“I haven’t eaten a warm meal in months before this. It brought me comfort I had forgotten.” .Elderly woman, Beit Hanoun

• Respectful and Dignified Treatment

 

Field teams were praised for their respectful, organized, and caring behavior during distributions. This contributed to a sense of dignity among beneficiaries, many of whom were experiencing extreme hardship and displacement.

 

“They did not treat us like beggars. They came every day, smiled, and asked if we

needed anything else.”. Displaced woman, North Gaza

• Community Trust and Safety

 

Participants expressed high trust in the implementing team, citing their consistent presence, transparency, and fairness in distribution. There were no reported cases of discrimination, tension, or exclusion.

“Everyone received food equally. There was no fighting. We trusted the teams to come every day, and they did.”. Shelter administrator

• Feedback on Meal Quality and Cultural Relevance

 

Many beneficiaries noted that the meals were nutritious, warm, and culturally appropriate. Most meals included rice, lentils and vegetables which were described as satisfying and familiar.

“The meals reminded us of what we used to cook at home—simple but full of care.”.

Displaced grandmother, Jabalia

“Even the children liked the food. It wasn’t just edible—it was tasty and healthy.”

Youth volunteer and caregiver

 

“This was the only meal we had each day. Without it, we would have gone hungry,” A

mother in Beit Lahia shelter.

 

4.  Challenges:

• Security Risks: Ongoing military activity disrupted supply chains briefly on two occasions.
• Logistical Delays: Fuel shortages affected transportation at the beginning of the project, resolved by local partnerships.

 

5.  RECOMMENDATIONS

• Establish contingency stock of fuel and food supplies in anticipation of supply chain disruptions through maintaining the existing annual contracts with the supplier who can supply all needed materials.
• Continue partnerships with local shelters and vendors to ensure swift
• Scale up the program in future emergency responses to reach 1,000 families and to    extend    meal    provision    beyond    30

6.  Lessons Learned

• Early beneficiary targeting and community involvement ensures smoother
• Hot meals are an effective immediate response tool in settings with no cooking
• Daily monitoring improves accountability and adaptability in rapidly changing

7.  Conclusion:

The Hot Meals Project in Gaza successfully addressed the immediate food needs of highly vulnerable populations affected by ongoing conflict, displacement, and severe resource scarcity. Over a 30-day period, the project consistently delivered 500 hot meals daily to 500 families, reaching an estimated 3,500 individuals, with a strong focus on children, the elderly, and displaced persons.

 

Evaluation findings confirm that the project met its stated objectives and contributed meaningfully to SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being). Beneficiaries overwhelmingly reported a reduction in food insecurity, improved nutritional status, and a restored sense of dignity during an exceptionally difficult time.

 

Despite operating in a highly volatile and resource constrained environment, the project’s timely planning, community-based targeting, and adaptive implementation approach ensured consistent delivery and positive impact. Collaboration with shelter administrations, local vendors, and community volunteers played a critical role in overcoming logistical and security challenges.

This intervention highlights the effectiveness of targeted, short-term food relief in preventing starvation and preserving human dignity. The experience also offers key lessons for scaling similar interventions, reinforcing the value of agility, local partnerships, and responsive monitoring in humanitarian operations.

The Hot Meals Project stands as a model for rapid food assistance in crisis contexts and underscores the critical importance of continuing and expanding humanitarian support in Gaza.

8.  ANNEXES

Annex 1: Logframe Matrix

Hierarchy of Objectives	Indicators	Means of Verification	Assumptions
Goal: Reduction in acute food insecurity among targeted population
Goal:			Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
Reduction in acute food insecurity among targeted population	At least 90% of beneficiaries confirme that their food insecurity was reduced	Interviews/ questionaires
Purpose/Outcome: Provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza, who are facing extreme conditions due to ongoing conflict and severe resource shortages.
Purpose/Outcome:
Provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza, who are facing extreme conditions due to ongoing conflict and severe resource shortages.	100 % of the beneficiaries are from facing extreme conditions 100 % of the beneficiaries confirm that hot meals were immediate relief and prevented starvation	Beneficiaries check list Shelters Reports	Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
Output 1.1: 500 families receive daily hot meals for 30 days
Output 1.1:	Shelters are selected and beneficiaries are determined and completed by May 27, 2025	Project Reports	Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
500 families receive daily hot meals for 30 days	Procurement of food supplies completed by May 27, 2025	Field monitoring visits
	500 hot meals / day are delivered to 500 families.
Output 1.2: Improved nutritional status of children and elderly
Output 1.2:
Improved nutritional status of children and elderly	Beneficiaries confirms improvement in their nutritional status	Field monitoring visits Interviews	Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained

 

Annex 2: M&E Plan

Indicators	Indicator definition	Data Source & Methodology	Frequency of data collection	Who is responsible	How will information be used and by whom
Goal: Reduction in acute food insecurity among targeted population
At least 90% of beneficiaries confirme that their food insecurity was reduced	The beneficiaries are food secure when they have food available with good quantity and quality	Interviews/ questionaires	Weekly	Coordinator	For Evaluation
				Field staff
				M&E staff
Purpose/Outcome: Provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza, who are facing extreme conditions due to ongoing conflict and severe resource shortages.
100 % of the beneficiaries are from facing extreme conditions 100 % of the beneficiaries confirm that hot meals were immediate relief and prevented starvation	Extreme conditions means living in a shelter with shortage or unavilability of food	Post-Distribution Monitoring (PDM) Survey   Distribution Summary Report Template	Weekly	Coordinator Field Staff M&E staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
	Relief and starving prevention means that the hotmeal the only meal they have during the day.	Beneficiaries check list Shelters Reports		Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
Output 1.1: 500 families receive daily hot meals for 30 days
Shelters are selected and beneficiaries are determined and completed by May 27, 2025	Select shelters and beneficiaries according to the criteria	Shelter administrations staff report	Weekly	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
Procurement of food supplies completed by May 27, 2025	Select vendors based on procurement process	Field staff daily reports	Initial Phase	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
500 hot meals / day are delivered to 500 families.	500 hot meals made from lentil, pasta and soup	Field staff daily reports Daily Meal Distribution Log	Daily	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
Output 1.2: Improved nutritional status of children and elderly
Improved nutritional status of children and elderly	Select shelters and beneficiaries according to the criteria	Shelter administrations staff report	Weekly	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities

 

Annex 3: Post-Distribution Monitoring (PDM) Survey Questionnaire

 

Project Name: Hot Meals Project in Gaza

Implementing Organization: Al-Amal Training Society for Women, Child and Handicapped

Survey Dates: June 28–30, 2025 Enumerator Name:                             Shelter Location:                           

Respondent Name (optional):                             Respondent Role: Household Head / Caregiver / Elderly

 

Section A: Household Information

 

1. Total number of people in your household:
2. Number of children under 12 years old:
3. Number of elderly persons (60+):
4. Is this a female-headed household? ☐ Yes ☐ No
5. What is your current shelter type?
   • Tent ☐ Public school ☐ Damaged house ☐ Other (please specify):

Section B: Access and Dependency

 

6. Was the hot meal your household’s only regular source of food during the

past 30 days?

• Yes ☐ No

7. Do you have access to any of the following (check all that apply):
   • Kitchen ☐ Gas ☐ Food stocks ☐ None
8. On average, how many hot meals per day did your family receive from the project?

Section C: Meal Quality and Cultural Appropriateness

 

9. How would you rate the quality of the food provided?
   • Very good ☐ Good ☐ Fair ☐ Poor
10. Were the meals hot when delivered?
    • Yes ☐ No
11. Did the meals meet your family’s cultural and dietary preferences?
    • Yes ☐ No
12. Did your children like the meals?
    • Yes ☐ No ☐ Not applicable

 

13. Did the elderly in your household express satisfaction with the meals?
    • Yes ☐ No ☐ Not applicable

Section D: Distribution and Timeliness

 

14. Were the meals delivered every day as expected?
    • Yes ☐ No
15. Were the meals delivered on time each day?
    • Always ☐ Most days ☐ Rarely ☐ Never
16. How would you describe the behavior of the distribution staff?
    • Very respectful ☐ Respectful ☐ Neutral ☐ Disrespectful
17. Did you witness or experience any discrimination or exclusion during distribution?
    • Yes ☐ No

Section E: Effects on Food Security and Well-Being

 

18. Did the hot meals help reduce hunger in your household?
    • Yes ☐ No
19. Did your children show signs of improved energy or better mood after receiving meals?
    • Yes ☐ No ☐ Not applicable
20. Did elderly members report improved strength, mood, or ability to take medication?
    • Yes ☐ No ☐ Not applicable

Section F: Overall Satisfaction

 

21. How satisfied are you with the overall support provided by the Hot Meals Project?
    • Very satisfied ☐ Satisfied ☐ Neutral ☐ Dissatisfied
22. Do you trust the implementing organization to support you fairly and respectfully?
    • Yes ☐ No

Section G: Open Feedback

 

23. What did you like most about the meals or the distribution process?

24. What could be improved in future food distribution projects?

25. Any other comments or suggestions?

 

Annex 4: Daily Distribution Summary Template

 

 

Date	Shelter Name	Number of Families Served	Number of Meals Delivered	Issues/Comments	Staff Signature
YYYY- MM-DD	Example Shelter 1	500	500	None	[Name]
YYYY- MM-DD

Notes:

• Completed daily by the field distribution
• Used to monitor consistency and resolve daily delivery

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

This evaluation was conducted with the dedication of Al-Amal Society’s project staff, field workers, volunteers, and mental health professionals. Special thanks go to the participating children and families whose courage and joy shaped the program. Gratitude   is   extended   to   LIFE   organization   and   its   donors.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

The “10 Days of Healing and Joy” project aimed to improve the psychological well- being and resilience of 1,000 children affected by the conflict in Gaza. Implemented over a short period, the project provided structured psychosocial support through play-based therapy, emotional expression activities, and community celebrations in child-friendly spaces. The project was implemented in 6 shelters in North Gaza where the  displaced  families  from  Jabalia,  Beit  Lahia  and  Beit  Hanoun  stay.

 

The final evaluation confirms that the project achieved its primary goal. Over 90% of children reported improved emotional well-being, and all 1,500 targeted children participated in PSS sessions. The evaluation used mixed methods (questionnaires, interviews, field reports) and found that access to targeted areas and a stable security environment                         enabled                         full                         implementation.

 

1.  INTRODUCTION

1.1  Psychosocial Project in Gaza

 

Children in Gaza continue to face psychological trauma due to repeated exposure to violence, displacement, and loss. This project was a rapid-response initiative aimed at offering relief and recovery through psychosocial activities in a protected and joyful setting.

The “Healing Hearts Through Laughter: A Psychosocial Support Project for Children in Gaza”

Project is a 10 Days of Healing and Joy: Psychosocial Support for Children in Gaza” is a short-term, high-impact intervention designed to support the emotional recovery and resilience of 1000 children affected by the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Over the course of 10 days, the project was planned to provide a safe, nurturing environment where children can express their emotions, build positive social connections, and experience joy through structured psychosocial activities, therapeutic clown performances, and culturally meaningful ceremonies.

The program combined daily group-based psychosocial support sessions with recreational therapy, including interactive clown shows and play-based learning. These sessions were facilitated by trained mental health professionals and volunteers, using child-friendly tools such as art, storytelling, music, and group games. The project also includes an opening and closing ceremony, creating a communal space for healing, celebration, and the rebuilding of hope.

Through this integrated approach, the project aimed to:

• Reduce the psychological burden of trauma and stress in children,
• Help them regain a sense of safety and normalcy,
• Reinforce emotional coping strategies,
• And promote resilience and community

By the end of the 10 days, it was planned that the children leave the program with joyful memories and small gifts, improved emotional expression, and the knowledge that they are not alone in their experiences. The project planned to lays the groundwork for continued psychosocial engagement through local partnerships and community involvement.

 

1.1.1  Project Goal:

To contribute in improving children’s psychological well-being and ability to cope with trauma following Gaza crisis”.

 

 

1.1.2  Project Objectives:

 

To provide psychosocial support for 1000 vulnerable children to enhance the well- being, resilience of children in child friendly spaces

The objective was planned to be achieved by:

1.      Provide Emotional Support:

To help children process their emotions and trauma in a safe and playful environment, using psychosocial sessions facilitated by trained professionals.

2.      Enhance Social Skills and Confidence:

To encourage positive social interaction, cooperation, and confidence through structured games, parties, and team-building activities.

3.      Foster Creativity and Expression:

To allow children to express themselves and engage in creative play, through activities like drawing, music, and performance, to improve emotional health.

4.      Promote Mental Health Awareness:

To educate both children and caregivers about mental health and well-being, reinforcing coping strategies through fun and interactive sessions.

5.      Create a Joyful, Safe Space:

To provide children with an environment where they can forget their worries and simply be children again, with a focus on joy, laughter, and connection.

The project was implemented in North Gaza shelters were families from Jabalia, Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahia are displaced

1.2  Purpose and Objectives of Final Evaluation

 

The purpose of this final evaluation is to:

• Measure the extent to which the project improved children’s psychosocial

well-being.

• Assess whether the planned activities were implemented as
• Identify key successes, constraints, and recommendations for future

 

2.  METHODOLOGY

 

2.1   Preparation

The evaluation was designed using the project’s M&E plan, focusing on goal, outcome, and output-level indicators.

2.2  Population of Study

The evaluation focused on 1,000 child participants, their caregivers, project facilitators, and community stakeholders.

2.3  Sample Selection

A representative sample of 200 children (20%), 30 caregivers, and 10 facilitators was selected for interviews and surveys.

2.4  Data Collection

Tools used: A simplified, age-appropriate questionnaire was used, in addition to behavioral observation and engagement during the sessions, and visual-based questions for younger children.

The goal of the questionnaire was to measure changes in general mood, sense of safety, and emotional expression before and after the sessions, field monitoring reports, and the service delivery summary report template.

2.5  Data Editing and Analysis

Quantitative data was analyzed for percentages of reported emotional well-being improvement. Qualitative feedback was categorized into thematic insights.

2.6  Participants in the Final Evaluation

200 children, 30 caregivers, 10 facilitators, and project M&E and management staff.

 

3.  KEY FINDINGS

3.1  Preliminary Results:

 

• Children

• Children showed noticeable improvement in their ability to express emotions, particularly after the second and third sessions.
• Older children demonstrated positive engagement in group activities, reflecting an increased sense of belonging and cooperation.
• A decrease in signs of anxiety and stress was observed in a portion of the children compared to the first session.
• 1500 of children participated in sessions and entertainment
• 95% of the children reported feeling less scared or worried after participating in the sessions, suggesting that the psychosocial support activities had a direct calming effect.
• 97% of children actively took part in group games and recreational This reflects the child-friendly and engaging nature of the sessions.
• 89% of the children stated that they felt happier, safer, and more hopeful following the program. This demonstrates a strong emotional impact and a sense of security restored through the intervention.
• 90% of children reported improved interaction with peers, including making new friends and talking more with others, showing growth in social confidence and bonding.
• 89% of the children shared that they participated in talent shows or creative expression activities such as drawing, storytelling, or singing, showing a high level of comfort and involvement.

 

Overall Psychological Well-being:

92% of the children indicated a general improvement in how they felt emotionally, reflecting the success of the psychosocial approach in helping children process trauma and regain a sense of well-being.

 

3.1.2. Caregivers – Observed Changes in Children

 

• 80% of caregivers noticed that their children were sleeping better after participating in the program, suggesting relief from anxiety and emotional
• 83% reported that their children were less irritable and angry, indicating an improvement in emotional regulation and mood.

 

• 90% observed that their children played more with others and showed improved peer interaction after the sessions.
• 87% of caregivers stated that their children were more open about discussing their feelings, showing increased emotional awareness and

3. 3 Facilitators – Professional Observations

 

• All facilitators (100%) confirmed that the children were highly engaged in the sessions and activities throughout the program.
• 90% observed that children became more expressive emotionally by the third day of the program, especially during drawing and storytelling
• 90% of facilitators reported that the sessions were implemented without significant logistical or behavioral issues, indicating strong planning and
• All facilitators (100%) noted that coordination with local partners and shelter management was effective, contributing to the smooth running of

3.2  Quantitative Findings

 

• Key Findings Against Key M&E Indicators

 

Indicator	Target	Achievement	Source
% of children reporting improved psychological well-being	≥ 90%	92%	Interviews, questionnaires
# of children supported through PSS interventions	1000	1500 children, 150%	Field reports, attendance records
# of structured PSS activities conducted	10 Days	11 Days implemented fully (Additional day was implemented in the hospital for the children)	Monitoring reports
# of recreational/entertainment days	10 Days + 3 Trauma Coping Days	13 total days	Activity reports

 

3.3  Qualitative Findings

 

Children reported feeling “happy,” “safe,” and “less afraid” after activities. Many mentioned enjoying drawing, clown shows, and storytelling the most. Caregivers observed improved sleep patterns, reduced irritability, and better peer interaction     in                                      their                                                children. Facilitators noted that children were highly engaged, especially in sessions that allowed               personal                                         expression              and                 teamwork. Challenges included occasional delays due to minor security alerts and access issues, managed without impact on the final schedule.

 Children’s Feedback (Ages 6–14)

 

“Before, I was always scared to talk. But when we played the ‘feelings game,’ I learned that it’s okay to say I’m sad or angry.” Suha, 9 years old

 

“I loved the drawing and clown day. It was the first time in months I laughed without thinking about bad things. “Nour, 11 years old

 

“I made three new friends. We still talk every day. I wasn’t talking to anyone before this program.” Hamza, 10 years old

 

“I didn’t want to come the first day, but now I wish it didn’t end. I feel stronger, like I can be happy again.” Rania, 12 years old

 

Caregivers’ Feedback

 

“My son used to cry at night from fear. Since the sessions, he sleeps more peacefully and tells me what he dreams about.” Mother of Bahaa, 7 years old

 

“Before, my daughter didn’t want to play with her siblings. Now she draws pictures for them and laughs while playing.” Father of Hanaa, 6 years old

 

“We noticed our child became more calm. He now talks about his feelings. This has helped the whole family become closer.” Mother of Zaki, 10 years old

 

Facilitators’ Feedback

 

“By the third day, the children began opening up. You could see it in their drawings, less dark colors, more hopeful images.” Female Facilitator, PSS Specialist

 

“One boy shared a story of his lost home through puppets. It was the first time he talked about it. These activities are truly healing.” Male Facilitator, Clown & Theater Coach

 

“We saw a real transformation. Children who were silent in the beginning became leaders during team games.” Senior Psychosocial Worker

 

Age differences among children made it challenging to design unified activities. Some camps faced logistical difficulties related to session locations.

There is a need for greater involvement of parents to improve the effectiveness of the intervention.

 

• Scale-Up Duration: Extend future programs beyond 10 days to sustain behavioral improvements.
• Increase the number of sessions and extend the project duration to enhance its positive impact.
• Allocate separate sessions based on age groups (e.g., 3–6, 7–11, 12–15).
• Provide additional training to facilitators on addressing age-related differences and behavioral challenges.

 

This project, implemented by Al-Amal Training Association for Women, Child, and Handicapped, has made a positive difference in the lives of the targeted children by providing a safe and supportive space for expression and emotional release. The results highlight the importance of continuing this type of psychosocial intervention in displacement settings and humanitarian contexts.

 

7. ANNEXES

 

Annex 1: Log Frame

 

 

Hierarchy of Objectives	Indicators	Means of Verification	Assumptions
Goal: To contribute in improving children’s psychological well-being and ability to cope with trauma following Gaza crisis”.
Goal:			Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
To contribute in improving children’s psychological well-being and ability to cope with trauma following Gaza crisis”.	At least 90% of the children report psychological well being improvement	Interviews/ questionaires
Purpose/Outcome: To provide psychosocial support for 1000 vulnerable children to enhance the well-being, resilience of children in child friendly spaces
Purpose/Outcome:
To provide psychosocial support for 1000 vulnerable children to enhance the well-being, resilience of children in child friendly spaces	1000 Children are suported by PSS interventions	Interviews/ questionaires Field reports	Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
Output 1.1: Opportunities for safe play, expression, place of entertainment and recreation for children provided.
Output 1.1:	3 days Coping with Emotions and Trauma conducted	Field monitoring reports   Services Delivery Summary Report Template	Security situation allowes for that Access to targeted areas is maintained
Opportunities for safe play, expression, place of entertainment and recreation for children provided.	10 Days of Psychodrama sessions and recreational and fun days are conducted	Field monitoring reports   Services Delivery Summary Report Template

 

Annex 2: Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

 

 

Indicators	Indicator definition	Data Source & Methodology	Frequency of data collection	Who is responsible	How will information be used and by whom
Goal: To contribute in improving children’s psychological well-being and ability to cope with trauma following Gaza crisis”.
At least 90% of the children report psychological well being improvement	The children report that they have less suffering from trauma	Interviews/ questionaires	Final Evaluation	Coordinator	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
				Field staff
				M&E staff
Purpose/Outcome: To provide psychosocial support for 1000 vulnerable children to enhance the well-being, resilience of children in child friendly spaces
1000 Children are suported by PSS interventions	The children enjoyed and benefited from PSS support	Post-Service Monitoring (PSM) Survey   Services Delivery Summary Report Template	End of the intervention	Coordinator Field Staff M&E staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
Output 1.1: Opportunities for safe play, expression, place of entertainment and recreation for children provided.
3 days Coping with Emotions and Trauma conducted	PSS sessions through different tools	Post-Service Monitoring (PSM) Survey Services Delivery Summary Report Template	3 days	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities
10 Days of Psychodrama sessions and recreational and fun days are conducted	Recreational days including psychodrams activities	Post-Service Monitoring (PSM) Survey Services Delivery Summary Report Template	10 days	Coordinator Field staff	Project staff and M&E staff to reflect on evaluation findings to review and improve Project activities

 

Annex 3: Questionnaire Items and Aggregated Results

1. Children Questionnaire and Results

Below are the questions asked to child participants and the corresponding aggregated results from the 200 surveyed children.

 

Indicator	Question	Yes	No	Sometimes / A Little	% Yes
Reduced stress or fear	Did the activities help you feel less scared or worried?	190	10	–	95%
Active participation in            group games	Did you enjoy participating in group games and activities with other children?	194	3	3	97%
Feeling happier, safer, and          more hopeful	Do you feel happier, safer, or more hopeful after joining the sessions?	178	10	12	89%
Improved peer interaction	Did you make any new friends or talk more to other children than before?	180	20	–	90%
Participation in            talent shows	Did you show your talent (drawing,                    singing, storytelling, etc.) during the sessions?	178	22	–	89%
Improved psychological well-being					92%

 

 

 

2.  Caregiver Questionnaire and Results

Caregivers were asked to evaluate observed changes in their children’s behavior after participating in the program.

 

Indicator	Question	Yes	No	Somewhat	% Yes
Improved sleep patterns	Did your child sleep better after attending the sessions?	24	3	3	80%
Reduced irritability	Did your child show less anger or frustration after the program?	25	2	3	83%

 

Better peer interaction	Did your child play more with other    children    after     the sessions?	27	2	1	90%
Increased emotional expression	Did your child talk more about     feelings     after     the sessions?	26	3	1	87%

3.  Facilitator Questionnaire and Results

Facilitators provided their assessment based on session observations and child engagement.

 

Indicator	Question	Yes	No	Partially	% Yes
High           child engagement	Did most children actively participate in activities?	10	0	0	100%
Improved emotional expression	Did children show improved ability to express emotions?	9	0	1	90%
Smooth session implementation	Were sessions implemented smoothly      without      major issues?	9	1	0	90%
Effective coordination with partners	Was coordination with local partners effective?	10	0	0	100%

 

 

Annex 4: Daily Session Reports (Summary)

 

Each day included:

1. Ice-breaker
2. Psychosocial sessions focused on emotional awareness and
3. Recreational activities such as clown shows, face painting, and
4. End-of-day debrief with facilitators